BBC 동영상 뉴스 칼럼

더불어 BBC 세계 뉴스를 보면서 함께 시사토론에 참여할까요?
이 BBC 동영상 뉴스 대본은 북스토아넷 비비씨에서 보실 수 있어요.

2007년 2월 13일 헤드라인 뉴스  
US negotiator Christopher Hill talks to reporters in Beijing on Monday
N Korea agrees to close its main nuclear reactor in exchange for fuel aid, in a deal reached in Beijing.

 
Bomb blasts kill three people on a pair of buses travelling towards the Lebanese capital Beirut.
A man opens fire in a precinct in the US state of Utah, killing five people before being killed in a shoot-out with police.
BBC 뉴스 동영상 칼럼
미국시사해설

영어설교 방송실
시사 칼럼
영화상영관
시사동영상
추천사이트
사이트맵
도서 검색창

BBC 비디오/DVD 서점

날자별 BBC 뉴스 동영상

BBC 동영상 뉴스 카페

BBC 뉴스 토픽 BBC 뉴스 2-12/ 핵폭탄은 남겨두고 영변 원자로만 폐쇄 합의
시사해설 및 칼럼   북핵6자회담: 남침용 핵폭탄은 남겨두고 영변 원자로만 폐쇄 합의

  1905년 주권이 야금야금 일본으로 넘어가고 있었을 때 대다수의 국민은 태평하였다.  지금 매국노 노무현이 대한민국 주권을 야금야금 김정일 손에 넘기고 있는데도 대다수의 국민은 태평하다.

   어제(2007년 2월 12일) 북경6자회담에서 남침용 핵폭탄은 남겨두고 영변 원자로만 6개월 내 폐쇄한다는 합의가 있었다.  그 합의의 의미를 살피려면 먼저 당사국들의 목적을 살펴 보아야 한다.  북한의 목적은 남침이요, 노무현 독재정권의 목적은 빗장을 열어 북한의 남침을 도와주겠다는 것이다.

   남침 목적을 위해 북한은 무엇을 전제하고 6자회담에 나오는가?  그것은 한반도의 주인은 김정일이요, 남한은 국가가 아니며 남한 국가원수는 한반도의 운명을 결정짓는 일에 대하여 외교적 대표권이 없다는 것이다.  좌익 노무현이 이런 김정일의 전제를 받아들이는 만큼 한국의 주권은 약해진다.

   이번 6자회담은 사실상 북미양자회담으로 결정되었기에 그만큼 한국의 주권은 약해졌으며 북한에 넘어가고 있는 것이다.  북한이 북미관계의 정상화를 따낼 경우 그만큼 남한의 민주주의 국가로서의 정체성이 흔들릴 뿐만 아니라, 김정일으 손을 뻗어 남한을 집어삼킬 수 있는 자리에 가까이 오게 된다.

   무엇이 합의되었는가?  남침용 핵폭탄은 그대로 남겨두며 일본과 미국에 발사할 핵폭탄 생산을 중단하는 댓가로 남한이 북한에 막대한 중유와 식량 지원을 해주는 것이 합의되었다.  이로써 이제 묵한은 남침용 핵무기 보유를 국제사회에서 합법화한 셈이니 도대체 지금 노무현 독재정권은 외교를 어떻게 하고 있는 것인가?
 

>> This is bbc world. The main news this hour: A deal to end North Korea's nuclear weapons programme was reached at six-party talks in Beijing. Explosions have thorn through two buss in Lebanon. At least four people have been reported killed. Our correspondent Daniel Griffis has been following events in Beijing. Charles Scanlon is in Seoul. I ask them both what they make of today's announcement on North Korea's nuclear programme and the chances of the agreement lasting. 45D1B998.JPG

>> I think we've got a long way to go yet, Mike. Certainly what this is a very important first step. There's no doubt about that. Bear in mind we've had more than three years of talks without any major progress. Now for the first time the North Koreans and the other countries have signed on the dotted line. The North Koreans have committed themselves to shutting down their main nuclear facilities. They've committed themselves to opening up those facilities to international inspectors, as well. So these are pretty big steps. But we still have a long way to go, a lot of unresolved questions because, of course, the North Koreans are talking about shutting down their nuclear reactor. What happens to those weapons that most intelligence agencies believe the North Koreans already have in their nuclear arsenal? No mention of those in any final agreement. So this is an important step forward, but there's stale long way to go, Mike. 45D1B9CC.JPG

>> Let's head to Charles Scanlon in the South Korean capital. Are you getting any sense about what happens just for one question to the weapons that North Korea allegedly already has?

>> Well, I think that's the whole point really. What we're looking at now is a containment exercise of North Korea. That plant at Yongbyon is churning out enough plutonium for about one weapon a year. When the possibility of a freeze was raised last year, the United States wasn't interested in the freeze. They wanted to roll back the whole North Korea nuclear programme, but they've considerably softened their position now. They've decided that a freeze of that plant is better than nothing and hopefully a first step to something more substantial. But as far as North Korea is concerned, this is a very big diplomatic victory because they're in a much stronger position than they were a few years ago, and, of course, it's only a few months since they tested that nuclear device. 45D1BA01.JPG

>> Charles, what do you think makes this deal different? In a sense we've been here before in 1994 with the Clinton administration in Washington. Very similar deal in some respects but it's foundered because most people feel Pyongyang was using it as a cover to pursue its programme.

>> A lot of people in this region will be asking lots of hard questions to the United States because they'll be saying that you through away the agreed framework back in 2002. People here would say it wasn't perfect, but at least it did contain the North Korean nuclear programme. There was some ambiguity about North Korea's nuclear capabilities. What they've done is used the last four years of confrontation to push ahead with the extraction of plutonium. They've tested a bomb. They now may have eight or nine nuclear weapons, and now we're going back to a freeze. People in the region will say it's been wasted four years and the United States' policy really hasn't helped. 45D1BA39.JPG

>> Daniel, in Beijing, if it is for real, do you get a sense of what it was that plead the

-- that made the difference?

>> I think certainly the Chinese have played an important role after the test at the end of 2006 that Charles was talking about. The Chinese went to Pyongyang and really read the riot act to the North Koreans, pretty much demanding that they return to the negotiating table. So that has certainly been an important factor. And the Chinese will be happy that at least some sort of agreement has been reached, but as Charles was pointing out; there really is still a long way to go, and the Chinese will feel that really they want to see much more of a commitment from the North Koreans, as well, because as we already discussing really in that sense, it's a victory for the North Koreans more than anything else. At the moment they get to hang on to the nuclear weapons they already have in their arsenal, and really in that sense it is a real victory for the North Koreans. Certainly the Chinese will want to see more from them in that regard, as well. 


 


[BBC동영상 뉴스 칼럼][한국어 뉴스 동영상][미국시사해설][영화감상실][동영상][추천 사이트][사이트맵][영어 뉴스]